admin
05-30-2003, 08:43 AM
The Interior Department claims that the Endangered Species Act is broken, in large part because of litigation challenging the agency's designations. The question to be addressed is whether
the litigation is a sympton or the disease .
More specifically, is the litigation the result of frivolous claims on the part of private claimants or is it a result of the agency taking
positions which is not based upon sound science?
Read press coverage
http://espn.go.com/outdoors/conservation/news/2003/0529/1560689.html
Views? Post your regulatory action of the day.
the litigation is a sympton or the disease .
More specifically, is the litigation the result of frivolous claims on the part of private claimants or is it a result of the agency taking
positions which is not based upon sound science?
Read press coverage
http://espn.go.com/outdoors/conservation/news/2003/0529/1560689.html
Views? Post your regulatory action of the day.