By
James A. Parcell - The Washington Post
|
|
Jim
J. Tozzi, the author of the Data Quality Act, is now a Washington
lobbyist and head of the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness,
a watchdog group that specializes in data quality. |
|
|
THE
FINE PRINT
|
|
A
Policy Puts Science on Trial
|
|
\'Data Quality\' Law is Nemesis of Regulation
|
By
Rick Weiss
Washington
Post Staff Writer |
Click
here for Jim Tozzi\'s response |
|
|
Things were not looking good a few years ago for the
makers of atrazine, America\'s second-leading weedkiller. The company
was seeking approval from the Environmental Protection Agency to keep
the highly profitable product on the market. But scientists were finding
it was disrupting hormones in wildlife -- in some cases turning frogs
into bizarre creatures bearing both male and female sex organs.
Last October, concerns about the herbicide led the European Union
to ban atrazine, starting in 2005. Yet that same month, after 10 years
of contentious scientific review, the EPA decided to permit ongoing
use in the United States with no new restrictions. |
|
Herbicide approvals are complicated, and there is no
one reason that atrazine passed regulatory muster in this country.
But close observers give significant credit to a single sentence that
was added to the EPA\'s final scientific assessment last year. |
|
Hormone disruption, it read, cannot be considered a
\"legitimate regulatory endpoint at this time\" -- that is,
it is not an acceptable reason to restrict a chemical\'s use -- because
the government had not settled on an officially accepted test for
measuring such disruption.
Those words, which effectively rendered moot hundreds of pages of
scientific evidence, were adopted by the EPA as a result of a petition
filed by a Washington consultant working with atrazine\'s primary manufacturer,
Syngenta Crop Protection. The petition was filed under the Data Quality
Act, a little-known piece of legislation that, under President Bush\'s
Office of Management and Budget, has become a potent tool for companies
seeking to beat back regulation.
The Data Quality Act -- written by an industry lobbyist and slipped
into a giant appropriations bill in 2000 without congressional discussion
or debate -- is just two sentences directing the OMB to ensure that
all information disseminated by the federal government is reliable.
But the Bush administration\'s interpretation of those two sentences
could tip the balance in regulatory disputes that weigh the interests
of consumers and businesses. |
|