Contact TheIPD.US




Regulatory Actions
View Public Comments
Submit Comments

NMFS ITA for Gulf of Mexico
NMFS Acoustic Guidelines
NMFS IHA for Scripps

Science
  Best Available Science on Acoustic Effects on Marine Mammals
  Seismic vs. Sonar
  Physical Effects
 Behavioral Effects
  Models
  Sound Propagation
  Mitigation
 Extrapolation From Terrestrial Mammal Acoustic Effects to Marine Mammals
  Cumulative and Synergistic Effects
 Indirect Effects

  NMFS
 MMS
 MMC
 NAS
  US Navy
 Sperm Whale Seismic Study
 ICES
 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Institute
 NRDC
 ACCOBAMS
 The Acoustic Ecology Institute
 ASCOBANS
 Fisheries and Oceans Canada
 Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Limited

Library
  Statutes
 Regulations
 Relevant NMFS Permits
 Major Studies and Reports

Comment on IPD
  Potential Research Projects
  Research Underway
  Structure of the IPD

CRE Interventions
  Agency Administrative Actions
  Rulemaking
  Litigation



















 

Soundings Archive

Bycatch Defenders Oppose The Data Quality Act
CRE and its Interactive Public Docket affiliate, the IPD.US, have long recognized the threat posed to the aquatic environment from bycatch, the incidental taking of marine species during commercial fishing operations.

The Alaskan fishing community also recognizes the danger bycatch poses to their livelihood. Now, the defenders of the current fisheries management regime recognizes the threat the Data Quality Act poses to bycatch. A recent commentary in AlaskaReport, "The voice of the Alaska fisherman since 1999," explains that the "Murkowski administration had someone testify before Congress that they wanted the Data Quality Act disqualified from pertinence to the Council process of fishery management of the North Pacific, or any U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. That way they can keep on putting the reports the big trawl companies don't like in the circular file. God forbid they should use quality data to manage the fisheries."

The testimony last year by the Deputy Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game before the House Subcommittee on Fisheries and Oceans stated, "Prevent Data Quality Act infringement on RFMC use of science for management." The Regional Fisheries Management Councils (RFMCs) were established by Congress to manage fisheries resources in various geographic areas. The State official expressed their belief that the Data Quality Act "as written...has the potential to have significant ramifications on the RFMC process...."

The testimony demonstrates the power of the Data Quality Act to ensure that fisheries are managed through the use of quality data and the ability of "pesky fisherman" to prevent their interests from being trampled on through the use of biased or otherwise flawed data.

  • Click here to read AlaskaReport commentary
  • Click here to read Congressional Testimony
  • Click here to read IPD article, "Recent Research Further Indicates Bycatch Is Greatest Threat to Cetaceans"
  • Click here to read IPD article "IWC Says Bycatch May Kill 2000 Marine Mammals Every Day"
  • Click here to read for IPD Blog "Bycatch Solutions"
  • Click here to read IPD Blog "IPD Blog In Need Of Bycatch Info"

  •  
    Copyright 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.