Contact TheIPD.US




Regulatory Actions
View Public Comments
Submit Comments

NMFS ITA for Gulf of Mexico
NMFS Acoustic Guidelines
NMFS IHA for Scripps

Science
  Best Available Science on Acoustic Effects on Marine Mammals
  Seismic vs. Sonar
  Physical Effects
 Behavioral Effects
  Models
  Sound Propagation
  Mitigation
 Extrapolation From Terrestrial Mammal Acoustic Effects to Marine Mammals
  Cumulative and Synergistic Effects
 Indirect Effects

  NMFS
 MMS
 MMC
 NAS
  US Navy
 Sperm Whale Seismic Study
 ICES
 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Institute
 NRDC
 ACCOBAMS
 The Acoustic Ecology Institute
 ASCOBANS
 Fisheries and Oceans Canada
 Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Limited

Library
  Statutes
 Regulations
 Relevant NMFS Permits
 Major Studies and Reports

Comment on IPD
  Potential Research Projects
  Research Underway
  Structure of the IPD

CRE Interventions
  Agency Administrative Actions
  Rulemaking
  Litigation



















 

Soundings Archive

No IWC Compromise on Commercial Whaling
The International Whaling Commission met during the week of June 21, 2010, in Agadir, Morocco. There was substantial discussion during the meetings about whether the IWC members could reach some compromise that would end the 25-year ban on commercial whaling. No compromise has been reached, and the status quo will likely continue for at least another year.

The status quo is a moratorium on commercial whaling that exists only on paper. Japan, Norway, and Iceland have been and still are conducting commercial whaling. A compromise was proposed by IWC chairman Cristian Maquieira of Chile and vice chairman Anthony Liverpool of Antigua and Barbuda. This compromise had been negotiated over several years. It would allow Japan to hunt up to 120 minke whales a year in Japanese coastal waters. It would also cut Japan's annual catch quota of minke whales in the Antarctic Ocean from around 850 at present to 400 for the next five years and 200 over the following five years.

Various factions are blaming each other for the failure to agree to this or any other compromise. Some NGOs blame Japan for being unwilling to give up whaling in certain marine sanctuaries. On the other hand, some pro-whaling factions blame NGOs whom they claim are irrationally against any whaling, and who they claim exercise too much control over some of the governments in the IWC. The pro-whaling factions support their arguments by claiming that the levels of take proposed do not represent any population level threats.

Whatever its future at the IWC, the commercial whaling issue will probably be raised in the special session on whales at the UN General Assembly in September, 2010, and at the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in Japan in October, 2010.

  • Click here for the IWC website

  •  
    Copyright 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.