Database

Use & Conservation Tillage
Environmental Impacts

Stakeholders

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness
Farm Groups
State Groups
Triazine Network

 

 


ENDOCRINE TEST VALIDATION

Human Effects

In order to determine whether atrazine, or any other substance, causes endocrine effects in humans or wildlife, the tests used to determine those effects must first be validated: i.e., proven accurate, reliable and reproducible. There are very few if any tests that have been validated for endocrine effects in humans or wildlife.

EPA is required by the FQPA, 21 U.S.C. § 46(a)(p), to validate tests to determine whether pesticides cause endocrine effects in humans. To validate these tests, EPA follows the validation process established by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), of which EPA was a charter member. ICCVAM, on their website, states:

"The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) was established in 1997 by the Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) to implement NIEHS directives in Public Law (P.L.) 103-43 [the 1993 NIH Revitalization Act]. This law directed NIEHS to develop and validate new test methods, and to establish criteria and processes for the validation and regulatory acceptance of toxicological testing methods. P. L. 106-545, the ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000, established ICCVAM as a permanent committee. The Committee is composed of representatives from 15 Federal regulatory and research agencies; these agencies generate, use, or provide information from toxicity test methods for risk assessment purposes. The Committee coordinates cross-agency issues relating to development, validation, acceptance, and national/international harmonization of toxicological test methods."

***

"The National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM) was established in 1998 to provide operational support for ICCVAM, and to carry out committee-related activities such as peer reviews and workshops for test methods of interest to Federal agencies. NICEATM and ICCVAM coordinate the scientific review of the validation status of proposed methods and provide recommendations regarding their usefulness to appropriate agencies. NICEATM and ICCVAM seek to promote the validation and regulatory acceptance of toxicological test methods that will enhance the agencies' ability to assess risks and make decisions, and methods that will refine, reduce, and/or replace animal use. The ultimate goal is the validation and regulatory acceptance of test methods that are more predictive of adverse human and ecological effects than currently available methods. Such methods are expected to support improved protection of human health and the environment."

ICCVAM has established a government-wide standard that requires proper validation of any tests before those tests can be considered reliable:

"Before a new or revised test method is used to generate information to support regulatory decisions, it must be (a) validated to determine its reliability and relevance for its proposed use, and (b) determined to be acceptable by one or more regulatory agencies to fill a specific need. Criteria for validation and regulatory acceptance have been prepared and are described in the report, Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Toxicological Test Methods: A Report of the Ad Hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods. Prior to the initiation of any test method development or validation efforts, sponsors are encouraged to consider the validation and acceptance criteria developed by the Federal government."

According to EPA and ICCVAM, validation is necessary to ensure reliable tests, and reproducibility is one of the primary scientific criteria for test validation:

"For a new or revised test method to be considered validated for regulatory risk assessment purposes, it should generally meet the following criteria.... "

"The extent of within-test variability, and the reproducibility of the test within and among laboratories must have been demonstrated. Data must be provided describing the level of intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility and how it varies over time. The degree to which biological variability affects this test reproducibility should also be addressed."

Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Toxicological Test Methods: A Report of the ad hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods ("Validation Criteria"), "Executive Summary", p. 2, Prepared by ICCVAM and NICEATM (March1997). Attachment E.

EPA has had difficulty validating endocrine effects tests for humans. EPA’s schedule for validating these tests has slipped considerably.

CRE's position on validation of tests for Human Endocrine Effects

CRE believes that conclusions regarding human endocrine effects must be based on properly validated tests.




disclaimer
Copyright Notice The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness [Copyright © 2003]. All rights reserved.