TheCRE.com
CRE Homepage About The CRE Advisory Board Newsletter Search Links Representation Comments/Ideas
Data Access
Data Quality
Regulation by Litigation
Regulation by Information
Regulation by Appropriation
Special Projects
CRE Watch List
Emerging Regulatory Issues
OMB Papers
Abstracts and Reviews
Guest Column
Regulatory Review
Voluntary Standards Program
CRE Report Card
Public Docket Preparation
Electronic Regulatory Reform
Consumer Response Service
Site Search

Enter keyword(s) to search TheCre.com:


ANSI Responds to CRE "Good Government" Recommendations
CRE, in response to an invitation from ANSI, recommended changes in the process by which Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) produce consensus standards intended for regulatory application. CRE recommended to ANSI's Executive Standards Council (ExSC) that SDOs developing standards intended for regulatory use incorporate the policies and procedures found in the federal "good government" laws. After consideration, the ExSc declined to adopt CRE's recommendations.

  • Read the ANSI letter to CRE
  • Read the ANSI ExSC Response
  • Comment on Item



    Ms. Anne Caldas
    Director
    Procedures and Standards Administration
    American National Standards Institute
    11 West 42nd Street
    New York, NY 10036
    April 11, 2001



    Dear Ms. Caldas:

         Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit, for consideration by ANSI's Executive Standards Council, proposed revisions to the ANSI Guide for the Preparation of Standards for Use in Regulations (ExSC 4643).

         As the ANSI Guide notes, "Government is now one of the principal users of consensus standards." Furthermore, government agencies are increasingly reliant on voluntary consensus standards for regulatory and procurement programs. ANSI’s recently revised MOUs with NIST and OSHA are indicative of the importance of private standards to government agencies. However, as ANSI’s National Standards Strategy recognizes, "Government agencies demand evidence that voluntary consensus standards meet high principles so that they can rely on them for both regulation and procurement."

         The following addition to the ANSI Guide is designed to provide closer conformity between ANSI requirements for standards development procedures and the federal "good government" laws which regulate the regulatory process. The changes are necessary to ensure that American National Standards are able to demonstrate the "high principles" required by government.

    Recommended Revision: ANSI Guide for the Preparation of Standards for Use in Regulations

    • Recommended new language is in bold italics.

    • Recommended text deletions is in strikeout format.

    BACKGROUND (Third Paragraph)

    The key to achieving greater recognition of consensus standards by government agencies is the preparation of documents in a manner and form that fulfills the public's needs. To ensure that documents intended for regulatory application fulfill these needs and can be readily adopted by government, SDOs should incorporate into their own operating procedures the policies and processes found in the laws which Congress enacted to regulate the regulatory process. The key "good government" laws which SDOs should adhere to when developing standards intended for regulatory application are: the Administrative Procedure Act; the Paperwork Reduction Act; the Regulatory Flexibility Act; the Data Access law (contained in the FY 1999 Omnibus Appropriations Act, P.L. 105-277); and the Data Quality law (contained in the FY 2001 Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 106-554). This ANSI Guide has been prepared to address these needs. provide additional guidance to assist SDOs in meeting public needs.



    Rationale

    The laws referenced above mandate a series of requirements that federal agencies must adhere to when developing regulations. Incorporation of these requirements into the process of developing voluntary consensus standards intended for regulatory application will make it substantially easier for government agencies to rely on the standards. Failure of SDOs to adopt these Congressional requirements would mean that agencies would have to comply with the procedural and analytic requirements themselves, thus duplicating much of the standard development process and substantially reducing the efficiencies associated with utilizing consensus standards.

    If you or the ExSC have any questions regarding CRE's recommendations, please feel free to contact me for additional information.


    Sincerely,




     

    Jim J. Tozzi, Ph.D.
    Chairman, Board of Advisors

     

    cc:   A. Marasco
    J. McCabe
    J. Thompson