How economists turned all of society into a market

Washington Post
 Review by James Kwak
” The book introduces us to the economists whose novel ideas persuaded politicians to see the world differently: Jude Wanniski, for example, whose famous cocktail napkin memorialized Arthur Laffer’s eponymous curve (if tax rates are too high, tax revenue declines), which was adopted by Jack Kemp and motivated Ronald Reagan’s 1981 tax cut; and Jim Tozzi, who in the 1960s pioneered the cost-benefit analysis of regulation, which has since become the corporate sector’s most powerful weapon against government oversight.”
📚

James Kwak is a professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law and the author, most recently, of “Economism: Bad Economics and the Rise of Inequality.”

The Free State Foundation Views on CRE

Editor’s Note

The Free State Foundation is a nationally recognized think tank which focuses its activities on the communications and related high-tech industries. It is lead by Randolph May, a recognized expert in telecommunications law having served as the Assistant General Counsel of the FCC. The Free State Foundation and the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness share the common goals of working to ensure that federal regulations are economically sound, comply with existing statutes and promote free markets. To this end the Free State Foundation is a leader in conducting forums which analyze in detail proposed regulations and often meld the views of divergent parties into a workable solution to a pending regulatory issue. The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness is most appreciative of its review of the activities of our organization as noted in this post on its website which is reproduced below.

Rob Fairweather, Former Acting Director of OMB, Describes OMB’s Exercise of Power

The Inside Story of OMB

                                    

                               How the President’s Swiss Army Knife Wields Power

Rob Fairweather
Available at Amazon                                                                                                                                           Barnes and Noble

 

CRE High Priority Projects

                              Three Milestones Consistent With CRE Priority Projects

                                                       Pacesetters

CRE Contributions to the Management of the Administrative State

National Archive Interview

Richard Nixon Foundation

Administrative Law Review

Journal Benefit-Cost Analysis

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Website

Vintage OIRA

Policy Entrepreneurs

Search Labs | AI Overview [Google]
Policy entrepreneurs are  people or organizations that use their knowledge and resources to influence policy outcomes and promote their goals. They are considered a unique type of political actor who can drive change and propel shifts in societal practices. Policy entrepreneurs are important because they help frame issues, build coalitions, and bring policy solutions to the attention of policymakers.

Welcome To The Club!

Although policy entrepreneurs operate in a manner similar to private sector  entrepreneurs there is a difference—policy  entrepreneur’s achievements are recorded in historical accounts  whereas private sector entrepreneurs achievements are recorded in bank accounts. You have made the grade.

 

The aforementioned text is furnished to those  who wish to recognize the contribution of a career federal employee who makes an unapparelled advancement in the provision of a particular good or service to the public.  Please forward a copy of your letter to this address and CRE will publish your letter on its website. We recommend that your letter describe the foundation  for your statements.

 

ChatGPT for Libraries

ChatGPT Tozzi QLR._Master (002)

Permanent Storage in  Archives

CHAT GPT on Jim Tozzi

Chat GPT Jim Tozzi OMB

Recent Decisions of the Supreme Court Make Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Virtually Impossible.

Two recent decisions of the Supreme Court, the Major Questions Doctrine and to a lesser degree Chevron, will make it virtually impossible to regulate AI. In addition, historically the legal community has been reluctant to take on the Supreme Court in venues outside the court room.  Consequently the future for a possible regulation of  AI  is dismal unless immediate action is taken to mobilize informed and interested personnel to implement the aforementioned link which leads to  the implementation of an out of court strategy.

CRE Recommendations To Address AI

Under Development