Public Participation

Chat GPT Jim Tozzi OMB

Two recent decisions of the Supreme Court, the Major Questions Doctrine and repeal of Chevron, will make it virtually impossible to regulate AI. In addition, historically the legal community has been reluctant to take on the Supreme Court in venues outside the court room.  Consequently the future for a possible regulation of  AI  is dismal unless immediate action is taken to mobilize informed and interested personnel to implement the aforementioned link which leads to  the implementation of an out of court strategy.

Under Development

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE)

–

CRE Recognition

Regulatory Officials By Adminstration

A number of our readers have requested that we compile a list of references that CRE has reviewed in addressing the possible regulation of AI. In reference to this request we have decided the following:

(1) We will post references to only those documents that we believe deserving of the most serious attention.

(2) We will solicit the views of our readers as to the documents that fulfill the requirement in (1) above. When we post a document so submitted to CRE ( contact@thecre.com )  we will not identify its sponsor unless requested to do so.

Artificial Intelligence in Weapon Systems: The Overview

CRE:  A must read. What constraints (regulations), if any, does the military impose on AI?

—

What Are The Lessons Learned From Attempts to Regulate The Social Media?

—

CRE Editorials

CRE editorials  on  a wide range of topics are in preparation; we welcome your recommendations at  contact@thecre.com. It should be noted that existing resource constraints limit the number of editorials we can produce.

—

Unfair Artificial Intelligence: How FTC Intervention Can Overcome the Limitations for Discrimination Law

—

AI By Presidential Administration

Nixon Foundation

Ford School

Reagan Institute

Bush 1 School of Government

Clinton

Bush 2 Center

Obama           

Trump

 Biden

A Look Back

—

Eye Openers

The Vanishing Policy Analysts?

—

Google Scholar

Google on AI

—

Homepage

The material on this page is the result of questions raised by the following post:

Can and Should AI Be Regulated?

 Q:  How do I submit a question?

A:   Use this link:contact@thecre.com. In the alternative you may use the comment section below.

Q: Should a new organization be formed to address this issue?  

A:  No. An interagency tribunal with full time staff provided by federal  agencies and led by a Presidential appointee would take ownership of the issue: Can and Should AI Be Regulated?

For years, we thought Google was asleep at the switch because they did little to expand upon the reach of their search engine as now witnessed by the emphasis on AI which might well be simply characterized as a search engine on steroids. Apparently the corporate strategy was to adopt the conventional strategy of maximizing shareholder welfare not consumer welfare.

New challenges need to be addressed by adopting a range of different disciplines; to this end is there a role for the inclusion of a counterpart to an antiballistic missile system strategy in the development of a system to regulate AI? More precisely, in that AI is being used in antiballistic missile systems how are the resultant ethic, legal and operational issues being addressed in this most critical of systems and are the resultant findings relevant to other systems?

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE)

We are answering the aforementioned question in large part as a result of an AI publication on the individual most critical to initiating the White House Office of Management Budget review of federal regulations at ChatGPT.

It appears that some of our followers  believe that the individuals that can take on the entire federal government ought to, at a minimum, be able to give some valuable insights into the possible regulation of AI. We at the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness have just begun work on this very significant task.

 ChatGPT

Under Consideration

Can and Should AI Be Regulated?

In Play

Recent Supreme Court Decisions Make It Virtually Impossible To Regulate Artificial Intelligence

Underway

Traditional Jazz and Administrative Law: Two Diminishing Institutions

CRE Public Policy Projects   (Incl.Parental Accountability in School Shootings)

Where are the Policy Entrepreneurs?

The Common Law Initiative: Challenging the Major Questions Doctrine

New Orleans Traditional Jazz Giants

From Our Inbox

Happenings 

–  Supreme Court Delivers VICTORY for the ADMINISTRATIVE STATE With Surprise 7–2 Ruling

Musically, traditional jazz musicians play in more of a swing-style.  The New Orleanian preference is not for an ensemble sound therefore it is  deemphasized in favor of solos. Traditional jazz  also differs from its southern origin by being faster paced, resembling the hustle-bustle of city life.

Traditional  jazz  is also characterized by its use of syncopation. New Orleans jazz, on the other hand,  is characterized by its use of collective improvisation.

A source in part

CURRENT EFAB WORKGROUPS

► SRF Investment Options:  Chaired by George Butcher, Butcher Mark Financial Advisors LLC, New York, NY

► Innovative Financing Tools:  Co-Chaired by Michael Curley, The International Center for Environmental Finance, Towson, MD and Langdon Marsh, National Policy Consensus Center, Portland State University, Portland, OR

► Financial Assurance Mechanisms:  Chaired by Mary Francoeur, Assured Guaranty Corporation, New York, NY Commercial Insurance :  Co-Chair, Justin Wilson, Waller Lansden, Nashville, TN Cost Estimation :  Co-Chair, Kelly Downard, Louisville Metro City Council, Louisville, KY