Public Participation

The Debt Sustainability Model (DSM) is a tool used to assess a country’s ability to meet its current and future debt obligations without resorting to default. It is an essential instrument in evaluating fiscal policies, the sustainability of public finances, and the risk of debt default. Here’s an overview of how the Debt Sustainability Model works and how it is used to assess debt default:
1. Understanding Debt Sustainability
Debt sustainability refers to a country’s ability to service its debt without incurring arrears or requiring debt restructuring. A country’s debt is considered sustainable when it can meet its debt obligations (both principal and interest payments) through its economic output, tax revenues, and other financial sources without compromising its long-term financial health or growth prospects.
2. The Debt Sustainability Model (DSM)
The DSM typically incorporates the following elements:
• Debt Dynamics: This includes the current level of debt, the interest rate on that debt, and the country’s economic growth rate.
• Primary Balance: The primary balance is the government’s budget balance (revenue minus non-interest expenditures) before interest payments. A government needs a sustainable primary balance to avoid increasing the debt-to-GDP ratio.
• Debt-to-GDP Ratio: The ratio of a country’s total debt to its GDP is a key indicator of debt sustainability. A rising debt-to-GDP ratio signals that the country is accumulating debt at a faster rate than its economic output, which can increase the risk of default.
• Interest Payments: Interest rates and the maturity structure of debt influence a country’s fiscal pressure. High interest rates can significantly increase the cost of debt servicing, posing risks for sustainability.
• Exchange Rates: For countries with foreign currency-denominated debt, exchange rate fluctuations can impact the cost of servicing debt. A depreciating domestic currency increases the burden of foreign-currency debt.
3. Key Components of Debt Sustainability Assessment
• Debt Projections: The DSM projects future debt levels and compares them to projections of GDP growth, fiscal balances, and interest payments. These projections are typically done under different scenarios, such as baseline (expected) scenarios, optimistic scenarios (with favorable growth), and pessimistic scenarios (with lower growth or higher interest rates).
• Thresholds for Debt Sustainability: Analysts use thresholds (often derived from historical data or research) to assess whether the current debt levels are manageable. For example, a debt-to-GDP ratio above 60% or a primary deficit might be considered unsustainable by some analysts, depending on a country’s specific circumstances.
• Stress Testing: This involves running simulations based on adverse conditions, such as a sudden rise in interest rates, a sharp decline in GDP growth, or an exchange rate depreciation. The goal is to understand how external shocks might impact the country’s debt servicing capacity and risk of default.
4. Assessing the Risk of Debt Default
Debt default occurs when a country is unable to meet its debt obligations—either by paying interest or by repaying principal amounts. The DSM helps assess the risk of such an event through:
• Debt Service Coverage Ratio: This ratio compares the government’s ability to generate revenue against its debt servicing obligations. If the ratio is low, the country may be at risk of default.
• Debt-to-Revenue Ratio: This ratio examines the relationship between total debt and government revenues. A high debt-to-revenue ratio indicates that a significant portion of government income is used to service debt, leaving little room for other public spending.  CRE’s conclusion relies heavily on this ratio as calculated by a number of authors.
• Primary Surplus or Deficit: A country with a consistent primary surplus (where its revenues exceed non-interest expenditures) is more likely to service its debt without default. Conversely, a primary deficit increases the likelihood of default, as it suggests that the country is borrowing more to cover operational expenses.
5. Applications of DSM in Assessing Debt Default
• Early Warning Systems: DSMs provide early warning signs of debt distress. When the projections indicate rising debt levels or declining fiscal balances, policymakers can take preventive actions, such as fiscal tightening or restructuring debt.
• Policy Recommendations: If the DSM analysis indicates that the debt trajectory is unsustainable, it can lead to recommendations such as improving the primary balance, implementing structural reforms, or renegotiating debt terms (such as extending maturities or reducing interest rates).
• Debt Restructuring: If a country is facing significant debt distress and a high risk of default, the DSM can help identify the need for debt restructuring. This may involve negotiating with creditors to reduce the debt burden, extend repayment periods, or adjust interest rates to make the debt more manageable.
6. Limitations and Considerations
• Model Assumptions: The DSM depends on assumptions about economic growth, interest rates, and other variables. If these assumptions are overly optimistic or pessimistic, the model’s predictions can be inaccurate.
• External Shocks: The DSM may not fully account for sudden global or regional economic shocks, such as financial crises, pandemics, or geopolitical events, which can dramatically alter a country’s debt sustainability outlook.
Political and Institutional Factors: Debt sustainability is also influenced by the country’s political and institutional stability. For example, weak governance or political instability may hinder the ability to implement necessary fiscal reforms.
Conclusion
The Debt Sustainability Model is a critical tool in assessing a country’s risk of default by examining the interaction of debt levels, fiscal policies, economic growth, and external factors. While it provides valuable insights, it is important to recognize its limitations and complement it with other indicators and qualitative analysis to get a more comprehensive understanding of a country’s debt situation.

The mathematics of debt sustainability is based on the idea that the government’s primary surplus must equal the stock of outstanding public debt to GDP ratio multiplied by the difference between the real GDP growth rate and the effective real interest rate paid on existing debt. This is expressed mathematically as:

(Tt – Gt  PtYt) = (rt-gt)(Bt-1 Pt-1Yt-1 )

Here’s some related information about debt sustainability:

• Debt sustainability and fiscal space

If (r−g) is less than zero, debt is always sustainable, even if it increases it will eventually converge. However, if (r−g) is close to zero and the government runs a large primary deficit, debt may increase for a long time and converge to a very high level.

There are a significant number of models used to address the implementation and composition of the “Bankruptcy Initiative”, a strategy consisting of the actions that need to be taken to minimize the adverse effects of uncontrolled federal spending for the past half-century recognizing that it is likely that the existing financial system will vanish.

What is needed is for experts to analyze each of the models used to address the pending issues and make an informed decision as to their strengths and weaknesses. Below is an analysis of the Debt Sustainability Model based upon the work of a number of skilled practitioners.

The Editor has been using the term US government “bankruptcy” in terms of the events that are likely to occur in the next decade.  Technically the US government cannot go bankrupt because it can simply continue to print more currency; the more accurate term is “debt default”.

That said, one of the reasons we are in the current mess is that economists generally write for other economists, not the general public, and look where we landed!

Click to read Dr. Jim J. Tozzi’s initial entry in AMERICAN MEN AND WOMEN OF SCIENCE

Cato Institute

Yes, one can make a set of assumptions that would cast the future of the US economy in a somewhat positive stance. That said, the probability of all the necessary conditions occurring simultaneously is remote.

See this article which is in agreement with position of the Editor.

Editor

Is the US Going Broke? Not Remotely

In that we are addressing a new phenomenon which is likely to begin in the next decade real life data is not available. We expect the economic community to play a major role in this debate. However it should be noted that there is no particular profession that has a monopoly on expertise. To this end we are presenting the disciplined views of a non-economist to our readers consideration. [ To the extent there are any partisan views present in the aforementioned publication  they are strictly  the views of the Author and may or  may not reflect the views of the Editor.

The Editor was  instrumental in establishing OIRA, having served as the Assistant Director of OMB including working for five  consecutive presidential administrations.

He has been asked his views a number of times regarding proposals to reduce federal spending.  Here is  his response.

Although I spent the majority of my federal career in  regulatory review, I started in the field of budget review.  After a number of years I left budget review and moved to regulatory review.

 Why, because I concluded It virtually impossible to eliminate yearly budget deficits. I arrived at this conclusion because I divided shareholders into two classes; giveth and taketh.