A Note on Industrial Strategies to Control the Contents of Science
In A Scientific Journal with Industrial Bias
as Its Specialty information is given about a scientific journal,
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, acting as a journal specializing in
the propagation of industrial views in scientific disguise.
This is part of an industrial strategy in order to gain influence on
scientific contents. Influence to control. This can be compared to
business journals selling good news about companies in exchange for
advertisments - advertising in journalistic disguise. A functional
business idea.
There is another facet of this strategy, the production of scientific
reference literature, which, as far as I know, seems to be unnoticed as a
general phenomenon. Examples are known [1].
If scientific information is biased towards industrial interests it will
inevitably imprison academic independent science in a biased scientific
discourse. How the scientific discourse is controlled is an issue of great
public interest.
Early in 2001 a reference work on risk evaluations concerning health and
environment was published:
Dennis J. Paustenbach (Editor): Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:
Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; ISBN: 0471147478; 1st edition
(February 15, 2001).
Dennis
Paustenbach is Corporate Vice President of Exponent, Inc.. Among Exponent's
clients you find the large chemical corporations and their branch
organizations. The consultancy services Exponent markets are among others
scientific reviews on behalf of the industry used in regulatory processes,
and in legal processes. The aim in the first case is arguing for
deregulation, in the second case to avoid responsibility. The "polluter
pays" principle and occupational health are the main areas where corporate
responsibility are at stake.
The industrial interest in consultancy services is proportional to the
consultants' reliability regarding corporate interests. Anything else
would be counter productive.
Paustenbach has a long history as a consultant involving the tobacco
industry as well as the chemical industry. Part of his attraction and
market value as a consultant comes from his capability to get nested with
strategic positions in the flows of scientific information, viz.
scientific organizations, in scientific media, and at scientific
conferences. Like the spider i the net he gets in position to work and
pull threads in the interest of Exponent's clients far beyond the specific
assignments.
Here follows a list of where Paustenbach is, or have been active:
- The board of Society of Risk Analysis 1997-2000
- Soil & Sediment Contamination: an International Journal published by the
Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) - Editorial Board
- Human and Ecological Risk Assessment published by AEHS - Editorial
Board
- Journal of Children's Health published by AEHS - Editor in Chief
- Toxicological Sciences published by Society of Toxicology - Assoc. Ed.
- Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology published by the International
Society for Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology - Editorial Board
The Association for Environmental Health and
Sciences (AEHS) is an organization of "professionals". There
is no information on the structure, board, financing...
Paustenbach participated in these conferences (and probably many more):
- Conference on the Proper Role of Epidemiology in Risk Analysis,
Boston, Massachusetts, October 13-14, 1994 - "The Lansdowne
Workshop". Organized by Federal Focus.
- Guidelines for the Proper Role of Epidemiology in Regulatory Risk
Assessment, London October 1995 - member of the organizing committee. -
"The London Meeting"". Organized by Federal Focus
- Forum on Cancer Risk Assessment Guidelines 1996, organized by ILSI,
Resources for the Future och US EPA.
The Federal Focus conferences are to
be regarded is key events in the development of GEP, Good Epidemiological
Practice [2]. The ILSI conference is just one of
several taking the concept further. Today the ideas from the Federal Focus
events are being finalized has the harmonized rules for risk evaluation
processes in the EU [3]. Federal Focus worked in close
connection with Philip Morris through Multilateral Business Services
with lobbyist Jim Tozzi as head, and the Institute for Regulatory
Policy with former OSHA chief, later lobbyist, Thorne Auchter as head.
ILSI is an organization of the chemical industry worldwide. Auchter's job
at OSHA during the Reagan era was to implement the "Regulatory
Relief Program", a program to which he has been loyal ever since.
Auchter participated in the Lansdowne Workshop.
When Paustenbach appears as the editor of a reference work on risks
concerning health and environment, it seems important to keep Exponent's
market interests in mind before taking the contents for granted. There are
many ways to overrule scientific integrity.
Bo Walhjalt
Notes
1. What Risk? Science, Politics and Public Health. Edited
by Roger Bate. Butterworth-Heineman. 1997.
This is a widely spread book, meaning of course that it is influential.
Roger Bate is an economist, and the book is a product with the same aims
as the Danish economist Bjorn Lomborg's The Skeptical
Environmentalist, although What Risk? has many contributions authored by
scientists.
2. Ong EK, Glantz SA: Constructing
"Sound Science" and "Good Epidemiology": Tobacco,
Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms. American Journal of Public
Health 91(11):1749-1757, November 2001
3. FIRST REPORT ON
THE HARMONISATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES. PART 1: The Report of
the Scientific Steering Committee's Working Group on Harmonisation of Risk
Assessment Procedures in the Scientific Committees advising the European
Commission in the area of human and environmental health 26-27 October 2000
(published on the internet 20.12.2000)
and
FIRST REPORT
ON THE HARMONISATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES. PART 2: APPENDICES
26-27 October 2000 (published on the internet on 20.12.2000)