The Public Eye
THE PUBLIC EYE
SPRING 2004
19
WATCHDOGGINGTHE
WATCHDOGS
The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness
(CRE) recently set up Watchdog Watch.
Watchdog Watch define[s] a regulatory
watchdog as an organization whose primary
activity is to either participate directly in a
wide range of regulatory proceedings or,
through their website, to significantly
influence the participation of other persons
in such rulemakings. The watchdogs its
watching include a whos who of progressive
groups: Consumers Union, CorpWatch,
Greenpeace International, Policy Action
Network, Public Citizen, Friends of the
Earth, PRWatch, and the U.S. PIRGs
(Public Interest Research Groups).
Source: https://thecre.com/watchdogs.html
But, says the CREwhose advisory
board consists (among others), of former
Office of Management and Budget
appointees, such as James B. MacRae (OMB
official under Reagan, Bush, and Clinton),
Jim Tozzi (an industry lobbyist who has
held various positions at the OMB in the
Nixon, Ford, Carter, and Reagan adminis-
trations)its paramount goals are To
ensure that the public has access to data and
information used to develop federal regula-
tions, and To ensure that information which
federal agencies disseminate to the public
is of the highest quality.
Source: https://www.thecre.com
HIGH SPY WITH MY
POWERFUL EYE
Despite an outcry over privacy implica-
tions, the government is pressing ahead with
research to create ultrapowerful tools to
mine millions of public and private records
for information about terrorists. Congress
eliminated a Pentagon office that had been
developing this terrorist-tracking technology
because of fears it might ensnare innocent
Americans. Still, some projects from retired
Adm. John Poindexters [yes, the Contra
man] Total Information Awareness effort
were transferred to U.S. intelligence offices,
congressional, federal and research officials
told The Associated Press.
In addition, Congress left undisturbed
a separate but similar $64 million research
program run by a little-known office called
the Advanced Research and Development
Activity, or ARDA, that has used some of the
same researchers as Poindexter's program.
The whole congressional action looks
like a shell game, said Steve Aftergood of the
Federation of American Scientists, which
tracks work by U.S. intelligence agencies.
There may be enough of a difference for
them to claim TIA was terminated while for
all practical purposes the identical work is
continuing.
Poindexter aimed to predict terrorist
attacks by identifying telltale patterns of
activity in arrests, passport applications,
visas, work permits, driver's licenses, car
rentals and airline ticket buys as well as credit
transactions and education, medical and
housing records.
The research created a political uproar
because such reviews of millions of transac-
tions could put innocent Americans under
suspicion. One of Poindexter's own
researchers, David D. Jensen at the Univer-
sity of Massachusetts, acknowledged that
high numbers of false positives can result.
Disturbed by the privacy implications,
Congress last fall closed Poindexters office,
part of the Defense Advanced Research Pro-
jects Agency, and barred the agency from con-
tinuing most of his research. Poindexter quit
the government and complained that his
work had been misunderstood.
In killing Poindexter's office, Congress
quietly agreed to continue paying to develop
highly specialized software to gather foreign
intelligence on terrorists.
In a classified section summarized pub-
licly, Congress added money for this soft-
ware research to the National Foreign
Intelligence Program, without identifying
openly which intelligence agency would
do the work.
It said, for the time being, products of this
research could only be used overseas or
against non-U.S. citizens in this country, not
against Americans on U.S. soil.
Congressional officials would not say
which Poindexter programs were killed and
which were transferred. People with direct
knowledge of the contracts told the AP that
the surviving programs included some of 18
data-mining projects known in Poindexter's
research as Evidence Extraction and Link Dis-
covery.
Poindexter's office described that research
as technology not only for connecting the
dots that enable the U.S. to predict and pre-
empt attacks but also for deciding which dots
to connect. It was among the most con-
tentious research programs.
Privacy advocates feared that if such
powerful tools were developed without lim-
its from Congress, government agents could
use them on any database.
The Poindexter and ARDA projects
are vastly more powerful than other data-
mining projects such as the Homeland
Security Department's CAPPS II program
to classify air travelers or the six-state,
Matrix anti-crime system financed by the
Justice Department.
See https://www.becomethemedia.com/news/2004/
TIA_alive_reborn.htm
Eyes Right compiled by PRA staff.
HAIKU
Subversives plotting?
Rights rolled into
a spyglass
The shadows scare US.
by Chip Berlet