|
September 3, 2002
Hon. Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.
Director
Office of Management and Budget
Eisenhower Executive Office Building
17th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20503
Re: Proposed Executive
Order on Public Participation in Agency Settlements
Dear Mr. Daniels:
The Center for Regulatory
Effectiveness ("CRE") requests that you consider recommending
for President Bush's signature the attached draft Executive Order on Public
Participation in Agency Settlements. This proposed Executive Order
would provide prior public notice of and a right to comment on agency
settlements that impact federal regulatory programs.
The public already
has the right to participate in the formulation of certain consent decrees.
More specifically, under 28 C.F.R. § 50.7, the public already has the
a right to prior notice and an opportunity to comment on proposed consent
judgements when the Government sues as a plaintiff to enjoin certain environmental
violations. The public should also have prior public notice and comment
rights when the Government as a defendant settles environmental or any
other type of litigation. In addition, under 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(f) the
public has a right to prior public notice and an opportunity to comment
on proposed antitrust consent judgements. This right includes the right
to review and comment on an Impact Statement prepared by the Government
for the proposed consent judgment. An antitrust Impact Statement explains
the competitive impact of the proposed consent judgment. An Impact Statement
assessing the regulatory impacts should also be provided when the Government
as a defendant proposes a settlement that impacts any federal regulatory
program.
Federal agency settlements
often commit an agency to regulatory action that substantially affects
the rights and duties of many persons who are not parties to the case.
Because they are not parties, most of the affected public now has no voice
in an agency's decision to settle. In many cases, most of the affected
public does not even know of the settlement until after the fact. Settlements
without prior public notice and comment disadvantage the agency. Without
prior public notice and comment, the agency may agree to settle a case
on terms that are inappropriate, unreasonable or improper for reasons
not even known to the settling agency. The attached draft Executive Order
would solve these problems by providing a nonpartisan right to prior public
notice and comment and an Impact Statement for the proposed settlement.
This proposed Executive Order does not protect or serve any special interest.
Instead, it protects the public interest by providing all stakeholders
notice and a right to be heard, and it ensures that an agency is fully
informed before it settles.
One glaring example
of the urgent need for this Executive Order is the EPA settlement in the
case NRDC v. Whitman, 2001 WL 1221774 (N.D. Cal. 2001). The consent
judgment and settlement agreement in the NRDC case dictate EPA's implementation
of the Food Quality Protection Act for years to come. EPA's settlement
with NRDC substantially affects and is opposed by persons with very diverse
interests, ranging from pesticide manufacturers to farmers to animal rights
activists. EPA first agreed to the NRDC settlement in the last hours of
the prior Administration with very little notice to the actual intervening
parties in the case, and no prior public notice or public comment opportunity.
Before approving the NRDC settlement, the Court itself ordered EPA to
provide public notice and to allow public comment on it because: "The
subject of the settlement is a matter of considerable public interest."
The Court emphasized that EPA's settlement with NRDC was negotiated in
a very short time "without an opportunity for meaningful comment
by even the interested parties who have already appeared in this case."
The Court concluded that an opportunity for public comment was required
"for the benefit of EPA' as well as the public and the Court.
The attached draft
Executive Order eliminates the possibility of back-room settlements between
any federal agency and any special interest group. It promotes regulatory
transparency and a voice for all stakeholders. It is carefully drafted
to minimize any additional burden on agencies. It will not encourage litigation
because it only applies when there already is litigation. It contains
several exemptions to ensure consistency with statutory requirements and
national security interests. It only establishes a public-notice-and-comment
right that already exists in some regulatory contexts, and should exist
in all.
On behalf of CRE and
the public interest, I ask you to consider recommending the attached Executive
Order for President Bush's signature.
Sincerely,
Jim J. Tozzi,
Member, CRE Board of Advisors
Attachment
|