![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
An Open Letter to the AMA Chair-Elect October 30, 2006
Edward L. Langston, RPh, MD Dear Dr. Langston: As one of the nation's leading science organizations, it is incumbent on the American Medical Association (AMA) to ensure that the information it disseminates comports with the highest levels of accuracy. At a very minimum, the AMA should take the steps necessary to:
2. Allow parties the opportunity to fully and effectively respond to inaccurate data, either in print or through the internet. To prevent continued publication of false, biased and otherwise sub-standard information, the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) recommends that JAMA adopt the same peer review guidelines all federal agencies must adhere to before disseminating information. As an interim measure, JAMA should take two key steps to reform their peer review process:
2. Response. JAMA should allow parties who, either directly or through their work, are the subject of an article the opportunity to fully respond either in print or through JAMA's website to the article. Similarly, this letter is being published on the home page of the CRE website. CRE believes in adhering to the principles we advocate. Therefore, we will publish on our website, complete and unedited, the AMA's response to this letter. Sincerely, /s/ Jim Tozzi Member, Board of Advisors |