Contact TheIPD.US

Regulatory Actions
View Public Comments
Submit Comments

NMFS ITA for Gulf of Mexico
NMFS Acoustic Guidelines
NMFS IHA for Scripps

  Best Available Science on Acoustic Effects on Marine Mammals
  Seismic vs. Sonar
  Physical Effects
 Behavioral Effects
  Sound Propagation
 Extrapolation From Terrestrial Mammal Acoustic Effects to Marine Mammals
  Cumulative and Synergistic Effects
 Indirect Effects

  US Navy
 Sperm Whale Seismic Study
 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Institute
 The Acoustic Ecology Institute
 Fisheries and Oceans Canada
 Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Limited

 Relevant NMFS Permits
 Major Studies and Reports

Comment on IPD
  Potential Research Projects
  Research Underway
  Structure of the IPD

CRE Interventions
  Agency Administrative Actions


Soundings Archive

NMFS Issues Another IHA for Alaskan Seismic
CRE previously reported that the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service has issued a controversial Incidental Harassment Authorization for seismic oil and gas exploration in Alaskan seas. This IHA is issued to Statoil USA E&P, Inc., for a seismic survey program in the Chukchi Sea, Alaska. See the Statoil article.

CRE has also issued another controversial IHA for Alaskan seismic. This one is to Shell Offshore Inc. to take, by harassment, small numbers of 8 species of marine mammals incidental to a marine survey program. The program includes site clearance and shallow hazards, ice gouge, and strudel scour surveys in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, Alaska, during the 2010 Arctic open water season. Like the Statoil IHA, the Shell IHA is issued n accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

Also like the Statoil IHA, NMFS received many comments on its proposal to grant the Shell IHA. Commenters included the Marine Mammal Commission; the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission; the Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope; the North Slope Borough Office of the Mayor; and Alaska Wilderness League, Audubon Alaska, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Greenpeace, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Sierra Club, and World Wildlife Fund; and a letter from Dr. David E. Bain, a contract scientist for NMFS.

  • Click here to read NMFS' Federal Register notice of the Shell IHA, and NMFS' response to comments on the IHA

    Copyright 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.