Contact TheIPD.US

Regulatory Actions
View Public Comments
Submit Comments

NMFS ITA for Gulf of Mexico
NMFS Acoustic Guidelines
NMFS IHA for Scripps

  Best Available Science on Acoustic Effects on Marine Mammals
  Seismic vs. Sonar
  Physical Effects
 Behavioral Effects
  Sound Propagation
 Extrapolation From Terrestrial Mammal Acoustic Effects to Marine Mammals
  Cumulative and Synergistic Effects
 Indirect Effects

  US Navy
 Sperm Whale Seismic Study
 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Institute
 The Acoustic Ecology Institute
 Fisheries and Oceans Canada
 Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Limited

 Relevant NMFS Permits
 Major Studies and Reports

Comment on IPD
  Potential Research Projects
  Research Underway
  Structure of the IPD

CRE Interventions
  Agency Administrative Actions


Soundings Archive

WP Article on Ocean Zoning
The Washington Post has published an article that discusses Ocean Zoning with Elliott Norse, chief scientist at the Marine Conservation Institute. According to the WP article:

    "Unlike a ban on offshore drilling, ocean zoning would allow what Norse calls 'extractive activities' but would limit them to specific areas. Australia successfully tried zoning in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in the 1970s, Norse says; President Obama has proposed such a policy, but the House defunded it in May."
The article further asks
    "How much of the ocean should be declared off-limits to hooks, harpoons and oil wells? 'A really good compromise that would allow us to save nearly all species of marine life would be to save 20 percent of each biogeographic region,' Norse says. The current set- aside? According to Norse, just 1.2 percent, resulting in the loss of fish from the waters of Israel, New England and the Chesapeake Bay - which, he says, is 'much more like a soup of algae than a place that used to be lined with oysters.'"
  • Click here to read Washington Post article
    Copyright 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.