Laguna Beach Independent
Editor,
There’s a false claim from some in the fishing community that “there’s no science” and that marine protection needs to “be studied more”. Scientists have, in fact, studied this situation extensively, and have proposed remedies including the Marine Protected Areas as part of the Marine Life Preservation Act. Do we need to study until our fish populations are nearly extinct and their populations can hardly recover – like the abalone, like the striped marlin, and like the giant sea bass? California’s nearshore fishery landings (commercial and recreational marine harvest recorded, shoreline to 20 fathoms depth) has declined precipitously from approximately 4,000 metric tons in 1980 to approximately 1,000 metric tons in 2000 (Schroeder and Love, UCSB, 2002), despite stricter regulations. Commercial fishing is still outpaced by the recreational fishermen who take approximately 60% of the total nearshore catch. Although “catch and release” has been suggested, this has been proven to be ineffectual as it still results in fish mortality and “may perilously delay population recovery or even cause local extinction.”