What is the Australian Government’s Role in Fostering Smoking? (3rd in an investigative series)

Editor’s Note: Nearly 90% of adult smokers began smoking before they old enough to legally buy a cigarette. Even though preventing underage access to tobacco is the way to prevent adult smoking, governments around the world routinely adopt regulatory polices which foster underage access to tobacco. In this article, we examine the initial decision of an Australian regulatory agency to prohibit tobacco to stop supplying retailers who also sell illicit tobacco. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s decision comes at the same time that the Australian Border Force has assembled a special Tobacco Strike Team to tackle to soaring imports of illegal tobacco and found that the Chinese tobacco coming into the country is contaminated with bird droppings, metal shavings, and worse.

CRE is investigating the role of regulatory policies in undermining the government’s tobacco control objectives. Part 1 of the series, What is the Role of the Canadian Government in Fostering Smoking? is available here and Part 2, The Ultimate Tobacco Control Failure: 90% of Pregnant Women Smoking is available here.

From: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission via ForeignAffairs.co.nz

ACCC proposes to deny authorisation for tobacco companies

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has issued a draft determination proposing to deny authorisation to British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco, and Philip Morris (the tobacco companies) to jointly stop supply to retailers or wholesalers they believe are supplying illicit tobacco.

The ACCC considers that having the three dominant tobacco companies working together, sharing information, and making decisions about whether or not to supply particular retailers raises competition concerns.

“The ACCC is concerned about the potential for the sharing of information broadly, and that, for example, the proposed arrangements could be used to selectively target retailers that stock competing brands. This could result in detriment to businesses that may be wrongly or mistakenly subject to a joint decision of the applicants to cease supply, without any opportunity for independent review of that decision,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.

These three tobacco companies are the major suppliers of legal tobacco products in Australia. They have proposed the arrangements to reduce the supply of illicit tobacco in Australia.

“While we agree that reducing illicit tobacco sales is in the public interest, we are not satisfied these proposed arrangements would reduce trade in illicit tobacco sufficiently to offset the likely detriments,” Mr Sims said.

The ACCC expects to release its final decision in February 2017.

Further information about the application for authorisation is available on the ACCC Authorisations Register.

Permalink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please Answer: *