Boards must consider internet’s dark side

From: Financial Times

By Anthony Goodman

As millions of us complete our holiday shopping online rather than deal with  the melee at the mall, pause a moment to consider the dark side of the internet.  Throughout 2012 board directors have told me the problem that most frequently  keeps them awake at night is protecting their companies from cyber attacks.

Back in April, I first wrote about what has been labelled a “cyber cold war”, involving state-sponsored hacking of companies. Experts say the threat has since  worsened.

In a speech in June this year, Jonathan Evans, director general of the UK  security service, MI5, warned of the risks from cyberspace: “What is at stake is  not just our government secrets but also the safety and security of our  infrastructure, the intellectual property that underpins our future prosperity  and the commercially sensitive information that is the life-blood of our  companies and corporations.”

At a recent meeting of board directors of top US companies in New York, Shawn  Henry, former executive assistant director at the Federal Bureau of  Investigation, responsible for cybersecurity investigations, said his agents  would notify companies “dozens of times a week” that their networks had been  breached. After initially denying that it was possible, companies “find that the  hackers have been there for months or years, unknown about and with unfettered  access to day-to-day communications like e-mails.”

Company directors have also told me they are aware of foreign intelligence  services planting people directly on company staff in order to extract  information. The trojan horse now wears a lab coat and companies must beware  geeks bearing gifts.

Mr Henry noted that “there are two types of companies: those that have been  breached, and those that don’t know they have been breached”.

The motive of cyber attackers might be theft of money or intellectual  property, reputational damage or actual physical harm. This month, the FT’s Bede  McCarthy reported that hackers stole over €36m from 30 banks in Germany, Italy,  Spain and the Netherlands. A bank director speaking at a meeting in New York warned of the potential for more serious attacks on the  financial system. “I am absolutely convinced that this is where the next ‘September 11’ will occur.”

Intrusion can also take a physical form, with cyber attacks destroying  computing equipment or even heavy machinery. One board director of a big  European multinational told me last month: “An electrical generator can be  remotely accessed and its parameters altered so that it is irreparably damaged.  Look at [Hurricane] Sandy and imagine a major metropolitan area with no power  and no prospect of power.”

Given the potential scale of the threat, it is surprising how many board  directors are ill-informed and ill-prepared for the worst case scenarios that  could paralyse their companies. A European director told me: “Too many board  members think that there isn’t a problem or that it is someone else’s  problem.”

Indeed, a report based on a survey of more than 100 board directors  and senior executives at Forbes Global 2000 companies by Carnegie Mellon CyLab,  a cybersecurity research centre, warned: “Boards still are not undertaking key  oversight activities related to cyber risks, such as reviewing budgets, security  program assessments, and top-level policies; assigning roles and  responsibilities for privacy and security; and receiving regular reports on  breaches and IT risks.”

Mr Henry told directors that boards have a critical role to play in  cybersecurity: “It starts in the boardroom – the leadership sets the pace … Every board should bring in the key leaders in the organisation to talk to  them.”

There are ways to defend the network, and its assets, even if it has been  breached. Intruders can be detected, monitored in real time and thwarted. Though  companies should be mindful of how security measures affect productivity, the  most critical information can moved off the network completely. The board should  ensure the company is not an easy target.

Wrestling with complex technical issues is not beyond the wit and wisdom of  the board. The first place the board will turn is to the head of the IT  function. Chief information officers will need to be ready for additional  scrutiny. After insisting that a CIO be replaced, one American director told me: “When the CIO comes to the board, you have to understand what they are saying.  We can’t take responsibility if we don’t understand.”

For other companies, the answer is to find new board members with the  requisite skils or experience. One American board director told me: “Some level  of technology experience is now part and parcel of the skill set any board  believes it needs.”

Another option is to bring in outside experts. One board member said: “It’s  like any other risk you are not comfortable with – you go and get some external  help.”

This Christmas, while Santa is coming down the chimney, a cyber attacker may  be making real-time changes to the nice and naughty lists creating a big  reputation risk for Saint Nick. That may be the nightmare before Christmas and  boards can’t afford to wait to find out what presents have been left for their  companies by cyber intruders.

The writer is a partner at Tapestry Networks

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please Answer: *