Issues

• Complaints
• Funding
• Governance
• MOU
• Responsiveness
• Transparency

CRE Interventions
•  Agency Administrative Actions
•  Rulemaking
•  Litigation

Government
•  Federal Computer Incident Response Center
•  National Infrastructure Protection Center
•  National Telecommunications and Information Administration
• US Department of Commerce
• US Office of Management and Budget

NGO's
•  Domain Name Rights Coalition
•  Electronics Frontiers Foundation
•  gTLD-MoU
•  ICANN at Large
•  Internet Society
•  The Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency

Technical Orgs
• CERT Coordination Center
• Internet Architecture Board
• Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
• Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
• Internet Engineering Task Force
• Internet Mail Consortium
• Internet Research Task Center
• Requests for Comments Editor

 

What Is Internet Governance and Why Is The Issue Being Left to the UN?
Paragraph 50 of the World Summit on Information Society's "Draft Declaration of Principles" calls on the Secretary-General of the United Nations "to set up a working group on Internet governance...to investigate and make proposals for action, as appropriate, on the governance of Internet by 2005." On one hand, the action can be seen as simply sidetracking the question of a UN role in managing the internet through two years (minimum) of study. On the other hand, the paragraph could be taken as legitimizing a role for the UN in governing the internet. However, regardless of exactly how the paragraph is interpreted, one point is clear, the United Nations will take a leading role over the next two years in redefining what is meant by the term "internet governance." Acceptance of a UN role in defining internet governance is particularly significant since much of the term is already effectively defined by the ICANN's Memorandum of Understanding and contract with the Department of Commerce. The US government has made clear that it opposes UN control of the internet. However, unless the US government takes clear steps to maintain its commitment to the currently accepted definition of internet governance through transparent, accountable mechanisms, there is a growing danger that UN institutions could eventually evolve to fill the vacuum.


  • Read Draft Declaration of Principles
  • Click to comment

  • Copyright © 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.