Issues

Complaints
Funding
Governance
MOU
Responsiveness
Transparency

CRE Interventions
  Agency Administrative Actions
  Rulemaking
  Litigation

Government
  Federal Computer Incident Response Center
  National Infrastructure Protection Center
  National Telecommunications and Information Administration
 US Department of Commerce
 US Office of Management and Budget

NGO's
  Domain Name Rights Coalition
  Electronics Frontiers Foundation
  gTLD-MoU
  ICANN at Large
  Internet Society
  The Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency

Technical Orgs
CERT Coordination Center
Internet Architecture Board
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Internet Engineering Task Force
Internet Mail Consortium
Internet Research Task Center
Requests for Comments Editor

 

ICANN and the Data Quality Act: Part 5 - Securing the Quality of WHOIS Databases
As has been discussed in the earlier parts of this series, ICANN is subject to the Data Quality Act under the provisions of the OMB and Department of Commerce/NTIA guidelines covering "sponsored information."1

Information for which ICANN has responsibility includes the WHOIS databases. ICANN has been given specific responsibilities for these databases under both their contract with the U.S. government's Department of Commerce to perform the technical management of the internet as well as ICANN's Memorandum of Understanding with the Department.

The second modification to the ICANN's contract with the Department adds a reporting requirement under which ICANN is to, among other duties, document procedures for "a root zone WHOIS service." In addition to their contractual duties, ICANN has specific responsibilities under their Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Department. The MOU gives ICANN explicit responsibility for improving the quality of the WHOIS data. The MOU states that "ICANN agrees to...implement measures to secure improved accuracy of WHOIS data." The required measures include publication of two reports regarding systems to improve WHOIS accuracy. The first of these reports is due March 31st of this year.

The MOU provides no direct mechanism for the public or affected parties to seek redress for grievances of any actions taken by ICANN or the Department under the MOU. However, the Data Quality Act does provide a formal mechanism for affected parties to seek correction of information that has been disseminated by the Department or ICANN as a result of the MOU.

Information is subject to the Data Quality Act if it is publicly disseminated by federal agencies or "sponsored" by an agency. The Data Quality Guidelines of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA, the operating unit within the Department of Commerce that is responsible for ICANN) defined sponsored information as "situations where the Agency has directed a third party to distribute or release information, or where the Agency has the authority to review and approve the information before release." With regard to WHOIS-related information, the MOU directs ICANN to publish the detailed reports. Furthermore, the MOU states that the Department will "provide general oversight of activities conducted pursuant to this Agreement." Thus, information that ICANN disseminates, or directs be disseminated, pursuant to the MOU is "sponsored" information subject to the Data Quality Act.

Conclusions

  1. ICANN, under their MOU with the U.S. Department of Commerce, has the duty to improve the quality of WHOIS data.
  2. WHOIS-related Information that ICANN disseminates under the MOU or contract with the Department of Commerce is subject to the Data Quality Act.
  3. The Data Quality Act provides a formal mechanism for affected stakeholders to seek and obtain correction of WHOIS-related information that ICANN-disseminates pursuant to their agreements with the Department of Commerce.


Footnotes:

1. A detailed discussion of this issue may be found in a Center for Regulatory Effectiveness letter to Dr. Paul Twomey of October 29, 2003.

  • Click to read more
  • Click to submit a comment

  • Copyright © 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.