Hospital Consolidation

RSSTwitterFacebook
  • About
  • Contact the Forum

Join the Review

Posted on September 18, 2013

 The very prestigious The Health Care Blog posted this comment by CRE on its website:

 http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2013/09/17/understanding-the-hospital-consolidation-numbers-the-centrality-of-data-quality/#comments

 Comments submitted to the THCB  include:

  Responses for “Understanding the Hospital Consolidation Numbers: The Centrality of Data Quality”

xyz’er says:

The DQA is an interesting approach – not sure much attention has gone into looking at this aspect of ACA …

Brad F says:

Bruce
Can you give a clearer example of why a study like the one above concerns you?

Based on the lit, hospitals consolidating and winning gains against providers goes beyond theory and is far from an anathema to those who follow the marketplace.

Qualitative in nature, the study does not have the rigor of others in the empirical literature, and constitutes one of many yes–but as I said above, carries themes familiar to many.

I understand your point on the DQA, but translate how you think purging the study results in alternate policy?

I assume you wish to set an example?

Thanks
Brad

Barry Carol says:

“The data showing that insurers overall have been keeping a greater share of consumer health care premiums is at stark odds with Berenson’s conclusions regarding declining insurer clout.”

Baloney!

Insurer claims costs consist of two components – utilization of services, tests, procedures and drugs, and PRICES for each of those. Every large insurer will tell you that prices for hospital inpatient and outpatient services, tests and procedures were the biggest single driver of their medical claims costs in recent years driven mainly by increasing hospital market power.

MLR’s declined because utilization declined and drug spending decelerated as a number of high selling drugs lost patent protection and dropped drastically in price once the six month exclusivity period expired and generic competition intensified.

There are surprisingly few economies of scale in the hospital business. There is some benefit in the purchase of supplies and access to investment capital is greater. However, since at least 60% of hospital costs are for employee wages and benefits, the large systems pay at least the same going rate as the smaller hospitals and often pay a premium for doctors which they offset by charging commercial payers higher prices based on their local or regional market power.

 

Our readers are encouraged to supply comments to the THCB website or in the alternative  supply relevant information to CRE by using the comment mechanism below; in-depth comments and supporting documents can be posted using the posting mechanism to the right of this article.

 

About The Health Care Blog

The Wall Street Journal calls us “the leading insider voice in the field.

The New York Times calls us “the authority.”

We’ve also been called “The New England Journal of Medicine.”

« CRE Levinson on The Health Care Blog
If Hospitals Had the Unilateral Power to Raise Prices They Would Not Have Layoffs »

Leave a Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please Answer: *

Links

  • The Federal Financial Forum
  • CRE
  • OIRA Watch
  • TheOMB.US
  • DataQualityAct.US
  • CRE Mission

Submit a Post




Upload Files



Archives

  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
CyberChimps

CyberChimps

© Hospital Consolidation