![]() |
|||||||
|
DataQualityAct.US
The Washington Post and New York Times on Data Quality
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003-1997 2008Doubt is Their Product - Early Reviews are InUnbalancing the scales of scientific objectivity Doubt Is Their Product (David Michaels, Oxford University Press) The Federal Data Quality Act's Impact on the Environmental Health Regulatory Process Doubt is Their Product What About Congress? Anchorage Port Plan: Politics and Pork Tozzi V HHS Groups seek more review of port expansion Wolf Delisting And Designation As Distinct Population Segment CDC Has Lost Control of the Autism Argument Crooked Timber The Monkey and The Organgrinder The Manufacture of Uncertainty Republican Foundations and Think Tanks Assessment On Program Operations Of Cumulative Impact Of External Requirements Added Since 1977 Industry Groups Are Fighting Government Regulation By Formenting Scientific Uncertainty NIOSH: Worker Exposure To Nanoparticles Miner Safety Bill Clears House, Bush Veto Looms Correcting the Record on the Data Quality Act (see page 2 of pdf) Activists File Rare Data Act Challenge Against EPA Refinery Air Rule NASA Evasion of Quality Control Procedures 2007Consumer groups lodge complaint about FCC studiesSon of Shelby DQA at the FCC Florida Panther Information Everybody wants to get into the [Data Quality] Act II Medical marijuana group moves to hasten outcome in federal lawsuit WHO fails to use quality evidence in recommendations Former Nixon/Reagan administration official tells FCC to deep-six Localism Study once more Turning the Tables with Mary Jane Should Government be forced to tell the truth? Other 2007 articles 2006Information Quality Act: Expanded Oversight and Clearer Guidance by the Office of Management and Budget Could Improve Agencies' Implementation of the Act, GAO-06-765The Government Pseudoscience Jig is Up - Data Quality Act E-Rulemaking and Data Quality ViroPharma Pursues Citizen Petition to Block FDA Approval of Generic Vancomycin 'A Regulation on Regulations' Nanotechnology: Data Quality Act Strikes Again Protecting Special Interests in the Name of "Good Science" Business Thinks Data Rule Isn't Worth Its Salt Other 2006 articles 2005Corporate Science PoliticizationScience Experiment: Industries Are Using a Landmark Case and a 2001 Law to Block Regulation, Critics Say Misuse(s) of the Information Quality Act Accounting For Science: The Independence Of Public Research In The New, Subterranean Administrative Law Industry Lobbyist Blows Smoke For Medical Marijuana Advocates "Hungry? Eat an Environmentalist": From Earth Day to Regulatory Reform, 1970-1980 NGO's Use The Data Quality Act Agency Admits Panther Whistleblower Was Right Other 2005 articles 2004Former EPA General Counsel Recommends Data Quality ReformsIs Environmental Data the Missing Link? Save the Endangered Species Act FEDS VS. MEDS U.S. District Court Rules HHS Data Quality Petition Denial is Not Judicially Reviewable Regulations law wouldn’t apply to NOAA under Senate measure The Neutered CRS Report On The Data Quality Act Paralysis by Analysis: Jim Tozzi's regulation to end all regulation. 'Data Quality' Law Is Nemesis Of Regulation Other 2004 articles 2003 - 1997Information Quality and the Law, or, How to Catch a Difficult HorseRead CRE's Legislative Working Papers on Data Access and Data Quality House Initiates Action on Data Quality President Signs Data Quality Legislation (Federal Data Quality Act (FDQA)) (Public Law 106-554 Section 515) The Congress has passed and the President has signed important new Data Quality legislation as part of the FY 2001 Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 106-554). Building upon the Data Quality report language contained in the FY 1999 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 105-277), this new provision requires OMB to develop government-wide standards for the quality of information used and disseminated by the federal government, with such standards to be completed not later than September 30, 2001. OMB must also include a mechanism through which the interested public can petition agencies to correct information which does not meet the OMB standard. Congress has provided for broad input in developing the Data Quality standard, mandating that OMB shall seek "public and Federal agency involvement." Data Quality:
Partners of Washington, D.C. Law Firm Author Article on Impacts of Tozzi
v. DHHS Case: CRE Sees Major Implications for Data Quality Act Washington Legal
Foundation (WLF) Article Seeks Increased Judicial Review of Agency Science
Risk Policy Report
Publishes Article on the Federal Information Triangle Definitive Data Quality Articles Other 2003-1997 Articles |
|